Is Bitcoin price rally to $150K possible by year’s end?


Key takeaways:

  • A 2021-style bearish divergence on the weekly chart points to a potential 50%+ correction toward $64,000.

  • Peter Brandt warns Bitcoin must reclaim its parabolic trendline soon or risk ending its bull cycle before reaching the $150,000 target.

Bitcoin’s (BTC) surge to a record $112,000 sparked renewed hopes for a $150,000 target by year-end, but its swift correction below $105,000 is testing that bullish narrative.

Is Bitcoin painting a bearish reversal setup?

Bitcoin is painting what appears to be an inverse cup-and-handle pattern, with its neckline near $100,800 acting as current support. As of June 7, the price has entered the handle-formation stage, eyeing a breakdown below the neckline.

BTC/USD daily price chart. Source: TradingView

Based on the inverse cup-and-handle pattern setup, a breakdown below $100,800 will increase Bitcoin’s likelihood of dropping toward $91,000.

The $91,000 downside target aligns with BTC’s 200-day exponential moving average (200-day EMA; the blue wave).

Bitcoin’s relative strength index (RSI) has declined in tandem with its price, signaling strong trader conviction behind the ongoing sell-off.

As of June 7, the RSI reading was 52, reflecting a weakening upside momentum; a break below 50 could intensify downside pressure.

To regain control, bulls must reclaim Bitcoin’s 20-day EMA (the purple wave) resistance at around the $105,000 level. A drop toward $91,000 could effectively lower BTC’s potential of hitting $150,000 by 2025’s end.

2021 fractal suggests BTC won’t hit $150,000 in 2025

At a broader timescale, Bitcoin’s weekly chart is flashing a familiar warning.

A bearish divergence has formed between price and RSI, mirroring the 2021 cycle top, when RSI trended lower despite higher price highs. That divergence preceded a 61% correction toward its 200-week EMA (the blue wave) and below.

See also  Ethereum EIP-7702 wallets roll out
BTC/USD weekly price chart. Source: TradingView

A similar structure is now visible, with a divergence forming just below the $112,000 high and a projected pullback target near the 200-week EMA at around $64,000, marking a potential 52% decline.

This historical setup casts doubt on Bitcoin reaching the widely discussed $150,000 target by the end of 2025, especially if the divergence confirms a broader market top similar to past cycles.

Veteran trader Peter Brandt adds further weight to this outlook.

In his May 2025 analysis, Brandt identified a rising wedge pattern and warned that Bitcoin must reclaim its parabolic trendline to stay on track for a $125,000–$150,000 cycle top by August or September 2025.

BTC/USD weekly price chart. Source: TradingView/Peter Brandt

He notes that Failure to do so could mark the end of the current bullish cycle—potentially triggering a typical 50–60% drawdown following prior tops.

Gold’s trajectory, Bitcoin “bull flag” hint at a $150K

Despite growing technical warnings, some analysts remain confident in Bitcoin’s path toward $150,000.

Traders see similarities between Bitcoin’s current market structure and gold’s explosive breakout in the 2000s. They argue that BTC could mimic gold’s historic trajectory, reinforcing the $150,000 scenario.

Analyst Tony Severino cites a potential bull flag structure to predict a BTC price boom toward $150,000.

From an onchain perspective, Bitcoin researcher Axel Adler Jr. believes BTC is approaching a critical “start” rally zone based on historical cycle patterns.

Bitcoin Price, Bitcoin Analysis, Markets, Tech Analysis, Market Analysis
Bitcoin Composite Index. Source: CryptoQuant

If the NUPL/MVRV ratio breaks and holds above 1.0, it would indicate the start of a new bullish impulse, the analyst notes, saying it could push Bitcoin’s price toward the $150,000–$175,000 range, similar to the rallies seen in 2017 and 2021.

See also  Tron says DAO X hack cost victims $45K, Curve Finance also hit

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.